Generating AI answer…
Quick results from the web:
Places of Worship Act does not bar acquisition of religious sites...
In court Places of Worship Act does not bar acquisition of religious sites for public purp...
Places of Worship Act does not bar acquisition of religious sites...
The petitioners had opposed the acquisition of six mosques as part of a road widening and...
Government school students cannot be compelled to recite Hindu pr...
ago Representative image | Indranil Mukherjee/AFP The Chhattisgarh High Court on Thursday...
Citizens entitled to protest, BJP ‘murdabad’ slogan not grounds f...
hearing, the judge asked why slogans such as “BJP government murdabad”, or down with BJP g...
In court Places of Worship Act does not bar acquisition of religious sites for public purpose: Allahabad HC The petitioners had opposed the acquisition of six mosques as part of a road … _Scroll || {}; _Scroll.articleTitle = "Places of Worship Act does not bar acquisition of religious sites for public purpose: Allahabad HC"; window._Scroll = _Scroll; })();
The petitioners had opposed the acquisition of six mosques as part of a road widening and beautification project linked to the Kashi Vishwanath Corridor.
ago Representative image | Indranil Mukherjee/AFP The Chhattisgarh High Court on Thursday clarified that no student can be compelled to recite Hindu prayers in a government school, Bar … It also contended that it had failed to protect students who did not wish to participate in religious observances, Bar and Bench reported.Edited by Nachiket Deuskar. © 2026 Scroll.in
hearing, the judge asked why slogans such as “BJP government murdabad”, or down with BJP government, and “Amit Shah murdabad” had attracted an externment order against Chaudhary, Bar … of Chembur, has organised protests on matters such as the Citizenship Amendment Act, the National Register of Citizens, alleged corruption in the waqf board and fuel price hikes, Bar
Unidentified persons have been booked after Tabassum Khan faced communal abuse online and her effigies were burnt.
The platform had challenged the commission’s directives against its 2021 privacy policy and proceedings before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
The bench said that the free online encyclopaedia must stay neutral rather than sounding like an online blog.
The court asked the authority what steps it had taken based on the recommendations of a committee formed after similar allegations in 2024.
YouTube said on April 29 that the news outlet’s channel was not available in India because of a government order ‘related to national security or public order’.
The petitioners argued that 35 lakh to 60 lakh beneficiaries would become ineligible if the state government applies the new criterion.