livelaw

Generating AI answer…

Quick results from the web:

About 6,084 results (1450ms)
moneylife.in

Court has called on the Centre and states to furnish data regarding vacancies in Central and State Information Commissions as well as the proposed timelines for appointment of Information Commissioners, says a report from LiveLaw

kamaleshforeducation.in

Minto Park Estates Private Limited Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 188 Principal Commissioner…

jurisinsider.in

Mahaveer Lunia & Ors. (2025 LiveLaw (SC) 630), has reiterated the settled legal position

oneclik.in

Source: livelaw Observing that the Irrigation Department of the State of Madhya Pradesh is not an "Industrial Establishment" under Section 25L of the Industrial Disputes Act, the Supreme Court has held that to decide as to

ncw.gov.in

NLU Odisha: Regional Consultation On Law Review of Cyber Crimes Affecting Women In Collaboration With National Commission For Women:- LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK Last updated: April 3rd, 2025

downtoearth.org.in

The Supreme Court has allowed euthanasia of rabid and dangerous free-ranging dogs under strict statutory protocols, while ordering states to set up Animal Birth Control centres, ensure anti-rabies vaccines, regulate feeding spots and remove dogs from high-footfall public places to protect public safety.

lawsathi.in

Unlock the best free legal research websites in India. From case laws to bare acts, discover 15 essential tools for lawyers and law students.

indiatoday.in

A Lucknow court has summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case over his 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra remarks against Veer Savarkar.

ipleader.in

Advocate Abinash Giri married before the marriage office in a simple ceremony On Dt. 25-07-2024 Advocate Abinash Giri practicing at the Advocates Chamber at Cuttack, Odisha gets married to a girl before the marriage officer of the Bhadrak District in a simple ceremony which cost him less than Rs.3000/- only which includes the registration fee,

libertywire.in

Supreme Court hears Rahul Gandhi’s defamation case over his ‘True Indian’ remark, raising questions on intent and freedom of expression. The case highlights political sensitivities around identity and speech. Supreme Court Hears Rahul Gandhi's ‘True Indian’ Defamation Case, Questions Intent Behind Remarks